Introduction Tab
Somerset Levels and Moors Phosphorus Budget Calculator V2.1
See the source image
                               
    Following the Dutch Nitrogen Case which ruled that where a site is failing to achieve condition due to pollution, the potential for a new development to add to the nutrient load is "necessarily limited". Special Areas of Conservation (SAC) sites are internationally important areas defined by the National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF) and given special protection under the European Union's Habitats Directive, which was transposed into UK law by the Habitats and Conservation of Species Regulations 2010. This was updated by the Conservation of Habitats and Species (Amendment)(EU Exit) Regulations 2019. As such, Natural England's view is that any development proposal that adds nutrients into the catchment of internationally important sites, such as the Somerset Levels and Moors, is likely to have a significant effect. Proposed developments likely to affect European Sites should be subject to Habitats Regulations Assessment to assess the Likely Significant Affect on the SAC. Applications within the catchment that will have a Likely Effect and will require an Appropriate Assessment (i.e. the nutrient calculator) to assess the implications of the proposal on the designated sites.    
    This tool is designed to quantify the nutrient loading of an area of land subject to a change of land use and population, in order to identify is proposed developments will be 'nutrient neutral'. Where the proposed development will generate additional nutrients into the system, solutions in how to offset the excess nutrients and achieve neutrality are presented.      
       
    This tool is only necessary for proposed developments that have the potential to increase nutrient loading to rivers that flow into the Somerset Levels and Moors. Where a site  drains to a Water Recycling Centre (WRC) outside of the catchment then no likely significant effects can be determined. However, SuDS should still be considered.    
    When using the findings of this tool for a nutrient neutrality assessment, users should either print the pages as a pdf or screenshot each page, and present this as evidence of the nutrient budget calculations.     
    The methodology employed within this tool was, in part, guided by Natural England's advice on nutrient neutrality in relation to the Stodmarsh designated sites (published in November 2020) and the Natural England provided calculator (published March 2022).    
    This tool consists of eight main worksheets:

Stage 1 - Identifies the additional nutrients as a result of changes in the population
Stage 2 - Calculates the nutrient load from current land use
Stage 3 - Calculates the nutrient load from future land uses
Stage 4 - Calculates the total change in nutrient loading as a result of the proposed development
Mitigation - current -Offers guidance on potential solutions to achieve nutrient neutrality under current wastewater permit limits
Mitigation - post 2025 - Offers guidance on potential solutions to achieve nutrient neutrality under AMP7 wastewater permit limits
Mitigation - post 2030 - Offers guidance on potential solutions to achieve nutrient neutrality under AMP8 wastewater permit limits
Mitigation land use comparison - Calculates the difference in mitigation solutions between current wastewater permit limits and post-2030 permit limits
   
       
                                 
    This nutrient budget calculator is designed to allow the user to:
- Calculate the nutrient budget for a proposed development, and if, in its current form, the proposed development is nutrient neutral; and
- Assess the various mitigation options if the proposed development is not nutrient neutral.
   
    The tool has been designed so that the user is able to update the data and methods in light of any new research or understanding          
    The information supplied in this tool is for guidance purposes only and is not intended to provide an exact budget calculation due to the limitations and assumptions of the model. The user is responsible for ensuring the accuracy and completeness of all data entered, be it manually or automatically, and used by this tool. The user is also responsible for any commercial decisions taken on any of the outputs of this tool.      
    Royal HaskoningDHV will not be liable for any of the following arising from the use of this tool (including from any negligence on the part of Royal HaskoningDHV):
(i) loss of anticipated profits or expected future business;
(ii) damage to reputation or goodwill;
(iii) damages, costs or expenses payable by the user to any third party;
(iv) loss of any order or contract; or
(v) indirect or consequential loss of any kind.
   
    This nutrient budget calculator has been developed by Royal HaskoningDHV on behalf of Somerset Council.          
    Phosphorus budget calculator, v2.1 (Released February 2023)          
                               
    The Tool uses the following colour coding to indicate the functionality to the user. These colours are:             
                                   
        The user needs to input a value here            
        This contains fixed or calculated values and the user does not need to input a value            
                                   
    Stage 1                            
    This stage calculates the change in nutrient loading as a result of changes in the population of a site. Step 1: The user should input the additional number of units that are proposed by the development. This is then multiplied by the occupancy rate per dwelling. Step 2: This automatically calculates the wastewater volume for the development. British flows and loads can be used for calculating bespoke wastewater volumes. Step 3: The user has the option to select whether sewage from the proposed development will be handled by water recycling centres or by Onsite treatment plants. The user must select one or the other, both options cannot be used. Step 3a: If the proposed development is to use WRC, then the user should select 'Yes' from the drop down box. Following this, the user should select the WRC that the development will connect to. This will select the discharge concentration from the chosen WRC. Step 3b: If the proposed development is to use Onsite treatment plants, then the user should select 'Yes' from the drop down box. Following this, the user should input the final effluent quality of the onsite treatment plant. If the efficiency is unknown then the user should input a precautionary default values. Higher removal rates can be achieved through Package Treatment Plants (PTPs) but these will typically require additional phosphate reduction such as chemical dosing that standard PTPs may not include.   Step 4: This automatically calculates the Total Phosphorus (TP) and Total Nitrogen (TN) loading from wastewater    
    Stage 2                            
    This stage calculates the nutrient load from the current land use. Step 1: The user should select the appropriate catchment, drainage type, rainfall band and NVZ. Step 2: The user should input the area (hectares) of the current land uses that make up the total area of the development site. A GIS viewer can be used to identify the land uses on a coarse scale (https://gridreferencefinder.com/). However, if more detail is known about the site land uses then this should be manually inputted by the user. The % removal from any existing SuDS can be inputted. Where the existing land use falls in the 'low density residential urban' category, a standard removal of 85% should be applied.     
    Stage 3                            
    This stage calculates the nutrient load from the future land use.

Step 1: The user should input the proposed land uses that make up the total area of the development site. Any pre-determined on-site mitigation should also be inputted here.

Bespoke banking coefficients should be inputted for constructed wetland that can be evidenced
   
    Stage 4                            
    This stage provides a summary of the nutrient loads calculated in stages 1-3 and presents the nutrient budget for the proposed development.

A 20% precautionary buffer is included to account for uncertainties in the runoff coefficients used.
   
    Mitigation - Current                          
    This stage calculates the area and land uses of the mitigation site required for the proposed development to be nutrient neutral, under current WRC permit limits.

Step 1: The nutrient budget to be mitigated will be automatically shown

Step 2: The user should either select 'Yes' for on-site mitigation (step 2a) or 'Yes' off-site mitigation (step 2b). For on-site mitigation, the user should select the land use which the mitigation land will be replacing. Where the exact land use type is unknown, an average value can be used.  For off-site mitigation, the catchment, soil drainage type, rainfall band and NVZ should be selected for the mitigation land and the most appropriate land use(s) selected.

Step 3: This will automatically show the area required for mitigation to achieve neutrality for each land use type.

Step 4: The user has the option to select the amount of nutrient load to be offset by the various land uses, which will then calculate the relevant area of land (Hectares) that needs to be changed.

Step 5: The user has the option to input the required area of land (hectares) to be mitigated until the project is nutrient neutral, which will then calculate the equivalent nutrient load for each land use.

The banking coefficients for wetlands uses a value for guidance purposes only. A site bespoke site-specific value will need to be calculated.
   
    Mitigation - Post 2025                        
    This stage calculates the area and land uses of the mitigation site required for the proposed development to be nutrient neutral, under post-2025 WRC permit limits. This only applies to TP. The steps are the same as 'Mitigation - current'.    
    Mitigation - post 2030                        
    This stage calculates the area and land uses of the mitigation site required for the proposed development to be nutrient neutral, under post-2025 WRC permit limits. This stage is for guidance purposes only. The steps are the same as 'Mitigation - current'.    
    Mitigation comparison                        
    This stage provides a summary in the differences in mitigation land use area between the current WRC permit limits and the post-2030 WRC permit limits.    
                             
    The land uses presented in this tool followed the CORINE 2018 land use data. Definitions of key land uses are presented below:          
                                   
    Land Use Description    
    Residential urban Areas of houses and associated infrastructure. This is inclusive of roads, driveways, grass verges and gardens.    
    Low density residential urban Rural communities are classed under low density residential land. Low density residential developments will typically have less than 25 units per hectare.     
    Commercial / industrial Land used for commercial establishments (the primary purpose of buying, selling or trading of merchandise or services including, without limitation, shopping malls, office complexes, restaurants, hotels, motels, grocery stores, automobile service stations, petroleum distribution operations, dry cleaning operations, municipal yards, warehouses, law courts, museums, churches, golf courses, government offices, air and sea terminals, bus and railway stations, and storage associated with these uses) , manufacturing plants, public utilities, mining, distribution of goods or services, administration of business activities, research and development facilities, warehousing, shipping, transporting, remanufacturing, stockpiling of raw materials, storage, repair and maintenance of commercial machinery or equipment, and waste management.    
    Urban open space Area of land in urban areas used for various purposes, e.g. leisure and recreation - may include open land, e.g. sports fields, playgrounds, public squares or built facilities such as sports centres.    
    Allotment and City farms Wholly or mainly cultivated for the production of vegetable or fruit crops for consumption by the tenant or local community. In some cases the land will also be used for ornamental plants and the keeping of hens or bees.      
    Dairy Holdings on which dairy cows account for more than two thirds of their total standard output.      
    Cereals Agricultural areas on which cereals, combinable crops and set aside are farmed.    
    Horticulture Holdings on which fruit (including vineyards), hardy nursery stock, glasshouse flowers and vegetables, market garden scale vegetables, outdoor blubs and flowers and mushrooms account for more than two thirds of their total standard output.    
    Pig Farming Holdings on which pigs account for more than two thirds of their total standard output.     
    LFA Holdings on which cattle, sheep and other grazing livestock account for more than two thirds of their total standard output except holdings classified as diary. A holding is classified as LFA if more than 50% of its total area is in the Less Favoured Area (LFA).    
    Lowland grazing Holdings on which cattle, sheep and other grazing livestock account for more than two thirds of their total standard output except holdings classified as diary. A holding is classified as lowland if less than 50% of its total area is in the Less Favoured Area (LFA). A paddock is classified as a small enclosures used for grazing horses.    
    Mixed Holdings for which none of the other categories account for more than two thirds of total standard output.    
    Poultry farming Holdings on which poultry account for more than two thirds of their total standard output.     
    General Arable Agricultural areas on which arable crops (including field scale vegetables) are farmed.    
    Greenspace Natural and semi-natural outdoor spaces provided for recreational use where fertilisers will not be applied and dog waste is managed, e.g. semi-natural parks. This does not include green infrastructure within the built urban environment as this is included in the urban categories.    
    Woodland Tree-covered areas which either arose naturally or as a result of plantations. This includes conifer woodland, mixed woodlands and broad-leaved woodlands etc.    
    shrub / heathland / bracken / bog Land that contains extensive areas of either shrubs, heath or bracken. A bog refers to land that is a wetland area of muddy ground that can accumulate peat.    
    Water Areas of surface water, including rivers, ponds and lakes.    
    Meadow / semi natural grassland A meadow is a field habitat vegetated by grass and other non-woody plant that has an open character and is not grazed by livestock    
Wetland Land use specific to constructed wetland only and does not include ponds or SuDS.
                                   
                             
    WRCs with a phosphorus permit are assumed to discharge at 90% of the permit. Measured data was used to derive the posphorus dicharge for unpermitted WRCs.  2025 and 2030 permit limits are incorporated into the calculator. Note that Broadway WRC & Ilminster were upgraded by December 2023, prior to 2025 deadline.

Please note that the calculator has adopted the stretch targets agreed for the WRCs in the catchment, as published by Wessex Water.
   
                             
    The drainage characteristics of soil has a control over the dominant flow pathways for pollutant losses and as such controls the loading of Phosphorus into surface water bodies. Therefore the runoff coefficients from various land uses are different in freely draining soil compared to impermeable soil. For impermeable soil under Arable land use, it is assumed that man made drainage systems would be in place, whereas rough grazing and woodland areas would not be drained. For free-draining soil, the majority of the flow would be to groundwater, and it is assumed that drainage would not be required.    
       
    b) Zoom into the development site on the map    
    c) Once the area has been located, click on the map where the development is located to find out the ID number and name of the soil type.    
    d) Make note of this and determine the drainage type using the below table    
    The following table is used to identify the dominant drainage type of the proposed development from the soil type identified above. The drainage type should then inform Stage 2 of the calculator    
    Free draining Impermeable - drained for arable Impermeable - drained for arable & grassland    
Colour ID Name Colour ID Name colour ID Name
3 Shallow lime-rich soils over chalk or limestone
1 Saltmarsh soils
17 Slowly permeable seasonally wet acid loamy and clayey soils
4 Sand dune soils
2 Shallow very acid peaty soils over rock
18 Slowly permeable seasonally wet slightly acid but base-rich loamy and clayey soils
      5 Freely draining lime-rich loamy soils   8 Slightly acid loamy and clayey soils with impeded drainage   19 Slowly permeable wet very acid upland soils with a peaty surface    
      6 Freely draining slightly acid loamy soils   9 Lime-rich loamy and clayey soils with impeded drainage          
      7 Freely draining slightly acid but base-rich soils   15 Naturally wet very acid sandy and loamy soils          
      10 Freely draining slightly acid sandy soils   16 Very acid loamy upland soils with a wet peaty surface          
11 Freely draining sandy Breckland soils
20 Loamy and clayey floodplain soils with naturally high groundwater
12 Freely draining floodplain soils
21 Loamy and clayey soils of coastal flats with naturally high groundwater
13 Freely draining acid loamy soils over rock
22 Loamy soils with naturally high groundwater
14 Freely draining very acid sandy and loamy soils
23 Loamy and sandy soils with naturally high groundwater and a peaty surface
24 Restored soils mostly from quarry and opencast spoil
25 Blanket bog peat soils
26 Raised bog peat soils
27 Fen peat soils
                         
    b) This will give a high-level view of operational catchments Use the zoom feature to find the exact location of the development.        
    c) Click on the light blue area on the map in which the development is located. This will inform the user of the operational catchment name        
    d) Make note of the name of the Operational Catchment and select it from the dropdown list in the relevant cell.      
         
    b) Enter the location of the development site in the search bar.        
c) Once the area has been located, click on the map where the development is located to find out if is within an NVZ.
    d) Make note of this and select this in the dropdown list.         
Royal HaskoningDHV company logo
              HaskoningDHV UK Ltd., a company of Royal HaskoningDHV
1 Emperor Way, Exeter Business Park
Exeter, Devon, EX1 3QS
Registered in England 1336844
W: www.royalhaskoningdhv.com
   
Information tab
     
                           
    Site address:  
                           
    Site proposal:  
                           
     
                           
     
     
Stage 1
              Stage 1  Calculate nutrient load (Kg/year) derived from the development as a result of increased population                      
Note: This calculation should only include the additional units resulting from the proposed development, including any development that will result in overnight accommodation. For land not currently in residential use, this will be the total units proposed by the development. However, for land already in residential use, this should only be the increase in units.

The user should input the relevant number of dwellings into options a, b or c below. In the case of residential developments, only option a is required. 
                                   
                                   
                1. Calculate the additional population Value   Unit                      
                a Number of dwellings proposed   dwellings                      
                  Average occupancy             2.30   persons/dwelling                      
                                                                 
                b Number of additional rooms above 6 residents (sui generis) for houses in multiple occupation   dwellings                      
                  Average occupancy 2.30   persons/dwelling                      
                                                                 
                c Number of rooms in a hotel or guest house proposed   dwellings                      
                  Average occupancy 1.60   persons/dwelling                      
                  Number of weeks open per year (1-52)   Weeks                      
Average occupancy rate (1-100)
%
                  Total population increase generated by the development   Persons                      
                                                                 
                                                                 
                2. Wastewater volume generated                                        
                                                                 
                  Water use per person               Litres/person/day                    
                                                                 
                  Wastewater volume generated by the development         Litres/day                      
                                     
              Please select how the sewage from the proposed development will be handled, noting that a development must be handled by either a water recycling centre or onsite treatment plants, and cannot be handled by both. Consideration of wastewater loading is not required where a site drains to a WRC that does not drain in to the Somerset Levels and Moors catchments                      
        Is sewage to be handled by water recycling centre?    
            Is sewage to be handled by Onsite treatment plants?
         
    3a. TP budget that would exit the Water Recycling Centre (WRC) after treatment     3b. TP budget for Onsite treatment plants  
Note: If the sewage is to be treated by WRCs then the user should select "Yes" in the list above. If package treatment plants are to be used instead, then the user should select "No" above.

This is the process of collecting wastewater from houses and guiding it, via the sewage network, to a WRC (also known as sewage works). The nutrient concentration of the influent is calculated by multiplying the number of people by the expected water usage per day. The nutrient concentration within the effluent is calculated by applying the discharge level of the appropriate WRC. The nutrient loading is expressed in kg/year.
Note: If the sewage is to be treated by on-site treatment plants then the user should select "Yes" in the list above. If wastewater treatment works are to be used instead, then the user should select "No" above.

On-site treatment plants are pre-manufactured treatment facilities used to treat wastewater in smaller communities or on individual properties. This concept is defined as decentralized wastewater treatment. The nutrient influent is calculated by multiplying the number of people by the expected loading per person. The nutrient effluent is calculated by applying the reduction efficiency. The nutrient loading is expressed in kg/year.
         
         
    Confirm receiving WRC and discharge level Value     Unit         Calculate nutrient load after treatment Value     Unit    
                                                                 
    Select the WRC the development will connect to
              Select the type of On-site treatment works  
         
                  Current discharge Post 2030 discharge                          
    Phosphorus WRC discharge level         mg/l         Phosphorus discharge level             mg/l    
                                           
    Note: Please use the drop down lists to select the WRC that the proposed development will be connected to. If the WRC is not known, then please select 'Unknown' from the drop down list.       Note: The user must input the reduction efficiency of the PTP. The efficiency of the PTP used must be evidenced. The evidence should include the test result documents from the lab (in English) and/ or measured effluent concentrations from real world applications. If the efficiency is unknown then a precautionary default value can be used  
                                           
                                                                 
    Calculate the nutrient load discharged by the WRC Value     Unit         Calculate loading from wastewater with onsite treatment plants Value     Unit    
                  Current discharge Post 2030 discharge                                        
      TP discharged by WRC         kg/year         TP discharged by on-site treatment plant         kg/year    
                                                                   
                                                                   
                                                                 
                4. Additional population load           Value   Unit                      
                                    Current Post 2030                      
                  TP load from additional population         Kg/year                      
                                                                 
                                                               
                                                               
Stage 2
        Stage 2 Calculate existing (pre-development) nutrient load from current land use of the development              
Note: Where development sites include existing areas that are to be retained, these areas can be excluded from the calculations in both Stages 2 and 3.
         
         
        1. Identify current land uses of the development site Value Unit                
      The user should select the value from the following drop-down list that applies to the development. Use the links below or navigate to the 'Introduction' tab to find instructions on how this information can be acquired.  
          Select the Catchment
                 
          Select the soil drainage type
                 
          Select annual average rainfall band
mm/yr                
          Within Nitrate Vulnerable Zone (NVZ)
                 
        Note: Use the links in the 'Introduction' Tab to find the soil type, catchment and NVZ map. The rainfall can be found in the 'Rainfall' tab.  
        2. Input the area of the existing land use type(s)         TP loading      
                                 
Residential urban Hectares
Kg/yr
Hectares
Kg/yr
Hectares
Kg/yr
Dairy Hectares
Kg/yr
Lowland grazing Hectares
Kg/yr
Mixed Hectares
Kg/yr
Poultry Hectares
Kg/yr
Pigs Hectares
Kg/yr
Horticulture Hectares
Kg/yr
Cereals Hectares
Kg/yr
General arable Hectares
Kg/yr
Allotments and city farms Hectares
Kg/yr
LFA Hectares
Kg/yr
Woodland (e.g. broad-leaved, orchard) Hectares
Kg/yr
Greenspace Hectares
Kg/yr
Shrub / heathland / bracken / bog Hectares
Kg/yr
Water Hectares
Kg/yr
Sum total
          Hectares       Kg/yr  
                                       
          SuDS removal                          
          Please input the total TP removal amount (%) calculated for the existing SuDS on site (if present). The calculated value should be justifiable with supporting evidence.             
                                       
          SuDS removal amount %                
                                       
        3. Calculate loading from current land usage                      
Value Unit
          TP load from proposed land usage Kg/yr                
Stage 3
        Stage 3 Calculate nutrient load for the proposed development  
        Note: This section should include all land uses within the proposed development. Where the proposed scheme is to create new wetlands, woodlands, nature reserves, etc. within the development site area, then this should be included within this section. Any offsite mitigation should not be included below, and should instead be inputted in to the mitigation tabs (if required).  
         
         
                           
        1. Identify proposed land uses of the development site Value Unit    
Residential urban
Hectares
          Commercial / Industrial Hectares    
          Open urban space Hectares    
          Allotments and city farms Hectares    
          Woodland (e.g. broad-leaved, orchard) Hectares    
          Green space Hectares    
          Shrub / heathland / bracken / bog Hectares    
          Water Hectares    
2. Designed Wetlands
Wetland area Hectares
          TP Banking coefficient kg/ha/year    
         
        3. SuDS removal        
         
        Please input the TP removal amount (%) calculated for the SuDS. The calculated value should be justifiable with supporting evidence.   
          SuDS removal amount %    
          Sum total of land uses Hectares    
        Note: The sum total of land uses must equal the development site area inputted in Stage 2 - the box will colour red if the areas do not match. For more information, please refer to the land use definitions in the help tab.  
                           
        4. Calculate loading from proposed land usage Value Unit    
          TP load from proposed land usage kg/year    
Stage 4
        Stage 4 Calculate the net change in nutrient load from the proposed development  
Note: This stage calculates the net change in TP load to the catchment from the proposed development. This is derived by calculating the difference between the load calculated for the proposed development (wastewater, urban area, open space, etc.) and that for the existing land uses. The nutrient budget for the site has been calculated under current, post-2025 WRC permit levels and potential post-2030 permit limits, where applicable.
         
         
Current
Post 2030
Summary
No. of dwellings
        1. Identify the load from additional population Value     Value Unit      
Current TP discharge concentration
          TP Loading from additional population     kg/year      
                          Post 2030 TP discharge concentration    
                                         
        2. Calculate net change in nutrient load from land use change Value     Value Unit   TP current land use     
          TP load from land use change     kg/year   TP proposed land use    
                                         
        3. Calculate nutrient budget for the development site Value     Value Unit          
          TP budget for the site     kg/year          
                                         
                                         
        4. Calculate precautionary buffer Value     Value Unit          
          Buffer amount 20     20 %          
          Precautionary buffer     kg/year          
                                         
Note: The figures used throughout this model are based on scientific research, evidence and modelled catchments and represent the best available evidence. However, it is important that a precautionary buffer is used that recognises the uncertainty with these figures and ensures, with reasonable certainty, that there will be no adverse effect on site integrity. As such, a 20% precautionary buffer added to the nutrient budget.
         
                                         
        5. Total nutrient budget for the development site Value       Unit          
          Total Phosphorus budget for the site     Kg/year          
                                         
Current TP loading
       
       
      Post 2030 TP loading  
       
                                     
Mitigation - current
        Mitigation - current Consider potential mitigation solutions for the proposed development          
Note: This section only applies to projects that will generate additional nutrients and as a result need to implement mitigation measures, in order to achieve nutrient neutrality under the current WRC permit limits. This tab is for guidance purposes only to provide an indication of the likely mitigation areas required for some (but not all) mitigation solutions. 
                 
                                             
        1. Nutrient budget to be mitigated Value     Unit                  
          TP budget to be mitigated         Kg/year                  
                                             
        2. Identify current land use of mitigation area                          
2a. On-site mitigation
2b. Off-site mitigation
        Note: If the mitigation is to be implemented on-site then the user should select "Yes" in the list above. If off-site mitigation is to be implemented instead, then the user should select "No" above. The user then has the option (by slecting 'Yes') to either select the average land use on-site or the specific land use if there is more than one land use present.       Note: If the mitigation is to be implemented off-site then the user should select "Yes" in the list above. If on-site mitigation is to be implemented instead, then the user should select "No" above.
                                  Identify current land use of off-site mitigation area
          Identify current land use on-site mitigation area Value     Unit                  
Select the Catchment
          Average land use of the on-site mitigation area  
Kg/ha/year       Select the soil drainage type
                                  Select annual average rainfall band
                                  Within Nitrate Vulnerable Zone (NVZ)
                                 
          Specific land use of on-site mitigation area               Specific land use of off-site mitigation area  
             
Kg/ha/year      
             
Kg/ha/year      
             
Kg/ha/year      
             
Kg/ha/year      
             
Kg/ha/year      
             
Kg/ha/year      
             
Kg/ha/year      
             
Kg/ha/year      
             
Kg/ha/year      
             
Kg/ha/year      
             
Kg/ha/year      
             
Kg/ha/year      
        LFA      
Kg/ha/year       LFA
             
Kg/ha/year      
             
Kg/ha/year      
             
Kg/ha/year      
             
Kg/ha/year      
                                             
                                  SuDS removal (%)  
                                             
        On-site mitigation land runoff coefficient               Off-site mitigation land runoff coefficient
                                             
                                             
                mitigation land runoff coefficient                
                                             
3. Potential land uses for mitigation Value
Constructed wetland
Urban open Space
Water
Woodland
Heathland / Bog
Meadow/semi-natural grassland/greenspace
          Designed Wetland banking coefficient                          
            Banking coefficient                        
        Note: This section calculates the required area (hectares) needed for each land use type to individually mitigate the total excess nutrients. This is included to provide context for the user when inputting required mitigation land uses in either section 4 and 5. Constructed wetland uses a generic runoff coefficient for guidance purposes only and cannot be relied upon. Site-specific values will differ and should be manually inputted above.          
4. Identify proposed land uses for mitigation
Value
Value
        Constructed wetland           Hectares            
        Urban open Space           Hectares            
Water
Hectares
        Woodland           Hectares            
        Heathland / Bog           Hectares            
        Meadow/semi-natural grassland/greenspace           Hectares            
                                             
          Sum total area needed to be created           Hectares            
                                             
        Note: This section allows the user to input the required TP to be offset for the various land uses, with the equivalent area that would be required to be created. If the mitigation is to be implemented on-site then the actual area of mitigation land may differ from the value quoted due to the relative reduction in other land uses on-site. For on-site mitigation, these areas should be used a guide and put back into Stage 3 until the project is nutrient neutral.          
                                             
        5. Identify proposed land uses for mitigation   Value       Value                
                                             
        Constructed wetland           kg/year            
        Urban open Space           kg/year            
        Water           kg/year            
        Woodland           kg/year            
        Heathland / Bog           kg/year            
        Meadow/semi-natural grassland/greenspace           kg/year            
                                             
          Sum total area needed to be created           Kg/year            
                                             
        Note: This section allows the user to input the required area for the various land uses to be created, with the equivalent TP to be offset in order for the development to be nutrient neutral. For on-site mitigation, these areas should be used a guide and put back into Stage 3 until the project is nutrient neutral.          
                                             
Mitigation - current
        Mitigation - post 2025 Consider potential mitigation solutions for the proposed development          
Note: This section only applies to projects that will generate additional nutrients and as a result need to implement mitigation measures, in order to achieve nutrient neutrality under the post 2025 WRC permit limits. This tab is for guidance purposes only to provide an indication of the likely mitigation areas required for some (but not all) mitigation solutions. 
                 
                                             
        1. Nutrient budget to be mitigated Value     Unit                  
          TP budget to be mitigated         Kg/year                  
                                             
        2. Identify current land use of mitigation area                          
2a. On-site mitigation
2b. Off-site mitigation
        Note: If the mitigation is to be implemented on-site then the user should select "Yes" in the list above. If off-site mitigation is to be implemented instead, then the user should select "No" above. The user then has the option (by slecting 'Yes') to either select the average land use on-site or the specific land use if there is more than one land use present.       Note: If the mitigation is to be implemented off-site then the user should select "Yes" in the list above. If on-site mitigation is to be implemented instead, then the user should select "No" above.
                                  Identify current land use of off-site mitigation area
          Identify current land use on-site mitigation area Value     Unit                  
Select the Catchment
          Average land use of the on-site mitigation area  
Kg/ha/year       Select the soil drainage type
                                  Select annual average rainfall band
                                  Within Nitrate Vulnerable Zone (NVZ)
                                 
          Specific land use of on-site mitigation area               Specific land use of off-site mitigation area  
             
Kg/ha/year      
             
Kg/ha/year      
             
Kg/ha/year      
             
Kg/ha/year      
             
Kg/ha/year      
             
Kg/ha/year      
             
Kg/ha/year      
             
Kg/ha/year      
             
Kg/ha/year      
             
Kg/ha/year      
             
Kg/ha/year      
             
Kg/ha/year      
        LFA      
Kg/ha/year       LFA
             
Kg/ha/year      
             
Kg/ha/year      
             
Kg/ha/year      
             
Kg/ha/year      
                                             
                                  SuDS removal (%)  
                                             
        On-site mitigation land runoff coefficient               Off-site mitigation land runoff coefficient
                                             
                                             
                mitigation land runoff coefficient                
                                             
3. Potential land uses for mitigation Value
Constructed wetland
Urban open Space
Water
Woodland
Heathland / Bog
Meadow/semi-natural grassland/greenspace
          Designed Wetland banking coefficient                          
            Banking coefficient                        
        Note: This section calculates the required area (hectares) needed for each land use type to individually mitigate the total excess nutrients. This is included to provide context for the user when inputting required mitigation land uses in either section 4 and 5. Constructed wetland uses a generic runoff coefficient for guidance purposes only and cannot be relied upon. Site-specific values will differ and should be manually inputted above.          
4. Identify proposed land uses for mitigation
Value
Value
        Constructed wetland           Hectares            
        Urban open Space           Hectares            
Water
Hectares
        Woodland           Hectares            
        Heathland / Bog           Hectares            
        Meadow/semi-natural grassland/greenspace           Hectares            
                                             
          Sum total area needed to be created           Hectares            
                                             
        Note: This section allows the user to input the required TP to be offset for the various land uses, with the equivalent area that would be required to be created. If the mitigation is to be implemented on-site then the actual area of mitigation land may differ from the value quoted due to the relative reduction in other land uses on-site. For on-site mitigation, these areas should be used a guide and put back into Stage 3 until the project is nutrient neutral.          
                                             
        5. Identify proposed land uses for mitigation   Value       Value                
                                             
        Constructed wetland           kg/year            
        Urban open Space           kg/year            
        Water           kg/year            
        Woodland           kg/year            
        Heathland / Bog           kg/year            
        Meadow/semi-natural grassland/greenspace           kg/year            
                                             
          Sum total area needed to be created           Kg/year            
                                             
        Note: This section allows the user to input the required area for the various land uses to be created, with the equivalent TP to be offset in order for the development to be nutrient neutral. For on-site mitigation, these areas should be used a guide and put back into Stage 3 until the project is nutrient neutral.          
                                             
Mitigation - current
        Mitigation - post 2030 Consider potential mitigation solutions for the proposed development          
Note: This section only applies to projects that will generate additional nutrients and as a result need to implement mitigation measures, in order to achieve nutrient neutrality under the post 2030 WRC permit limits. This tab is for guidance purposes only to provide an indication of the likely mitigation areas required for some (but not all) mitigation solutions. 
                 
                                             
        1. Nutrient budget to be mitigated Value     Unit                  
          TP budget to be mitigated         Kg/year                  
                                             
        2. Identify current land use of mitigation area                          
2a. On-site mitigation
2b. Off-site mitigation
        Note: If the mitigation is to be implemented on-site then the user should select "Yes" in the list above. If off-site mitigation is to be implemented instead, then the user should select "No" above. The user then has the option (by slecting 'Yes') to either select the average land use on-site or the specific land use if there is more than one land use present.       Note: If the mitigation is to be implemented off-site then the user should select "Yes" in the list above. If on-site mitigation is to be implemented instead, then the user should select "No" above.
                                  Identify current land use of off-site mitigation area
          Identify current land use on-site mitigation area Value     Unit                  
Select the Catchment
          Average land use of the on-site mitigation area  
Kg/ha/year       Select the soil drainage type
                                  Select annual average rainfall band
                                  Within Nitrate Vulnerable Zone (NVZ)
                                 
          Specific land use of on-site mitigation area               Specific land use of off-site mitigation area  
             
Kg/ha/year      
             
Kg/ha/year      
             
Kg/ha/year      
             
Kg/ha/year      
             
Kg/ha/year      
             
Kg/ha/year      
             
Kg/ha/year      
             
Kg/ha/year      
             
Kg/ha/year      
             
Kg/ha/year      
             
Kg/ha/year      
             
Kg/ha/year      
        LFA      
Kg/ha/year       LFA
             
Kg/ha/year      
             
Kg/ha/year      
             
Kg/ha/year      
             
Kg/ha/year      
                                             
                                  SuDS removal (%)  
                                             
        On-site mitigation land runoff coefficient               Off-site mitigation land runoff coefficient
                                             
                                             
                mitigation land runoff coefficient                
                                             
3. Potential land uses for mitigation Value
Constructed wetland
Urban open Space
Water
Woodland
Heathland / Bog
Meadow/semi-natural grassland/greenspace
          Designed Wetland banking coefficient                          
            Banking coefficient                        
        Note: This section calculates the required area (hectares) needed for each land use type to individually mitigate the total excess nutrients. This is included to provide context for the user when inputting required mitigation land uses in either section 4 and 5. Constructed wetland uses a generic runoff coefficient for guidance purposes only and cannot be relied upon. Site-specific values will differ and should be manually inputted above.          
4. Identify proposed land uses for mitigation
Value
Value
        Constructed wetland           Hectares            
        Urban open Space           Hectares            
Water
Hectares
        Woodland           Hectares            
        Heathland / Bog           Hectares            
        Meadow/semi-natural grassland/greenspace           Hectares            
                                             
          Sum total area needed to be created           Hectares            
                                             
        Note: This section allows the user to input the required TP to be offset for the various land uses, with the equivalent area that would be required to be created. If the mitigation is to be implemented on-site then the actual area of mitigation land may differ from the value quoted due to the relative reduction in other land uses on-site. For on-site mitigation, these areas should be used a guide and put back into Stage 3 until the project is nutrient neutral.          
                                             
        5. Identify proposed land uses for mitigation   Value       Value                
                                             
        Constructed wetland           kg/year            
        Urban open Space           kg/year            
        Water           kg/year            
        Woodland           kg/year            
        Heathland / Bog           kg/year            
        Meadow/semi-natural grassland/greenspace           kg/year            
                                             
          Sum total area needed to be created           Kg/year            
                                             
        Note: This section allows the user to input the required area for the various land uses to be created, with the equivalent TP to be offset in order for the development to be nutrient neutral. For on-site mitigation, these areas should be used a guide and put back into Stage 3 until the project is nutrient neutral.          
                                             
Mitigation comparison
                                     
        Mitigation comparison Difference in TP mitigation land uses between current WRC permit limits and post 2030 WRC permit limits      
                                     
        1. Total Area of proposed TP mitigation land uses Current WRC   Post 2030 WRC   Difference        
                    Value   Value   Value   Units    
          Constructed wetland       Hectares    
          Open Space / Greenfield       Hectares    
          Water       Hectares    
          Woodland       Hectares    
          Heathland / Bog       Hectares    
          Meadow/semi-natural grassland       Hectares    
                                     
          Sum total area needed to be created       Hectares    
                                     
Note: This section demonstrates to the user the amount of mitigation land that is no longer required for the project to be 'Phosphate Neutral' following implementation of the 2030 WRC permit limits
           
Rainfall Tab